Crimes and Ethical Dilemmas in the News

Crimes and Ethical Dilemmas in the News

Spread the love

Two items in Sunday’s papers caught my interest, and possibly yours.  “Metro edict choking Phantom Planter’s blooms” in the Washington Post really warmed my heart – except for the part about Metro.  Part-time lawyer Henry Doctor has been planting flowering plants in the 176 otherwise abandoned little planters along the escalator leading to the Dupont Circle subway station (aka Metro).   I’ve ridden those multi-story escalators and very much appreciated the plants, and had no idea a volunteer gardener was to thank for  them.  Trouble is, he asked for permission and was told he’d face “arrest, fines and imprisonment” if he continued to tend to the 1,000 flowers he planted there.  (By the way, the story doesn’t tell us why they’re abandoned.  For at least 20 years they contained groundcover Junipers and looked terrific.)

The back story is that the Phantom Planter here has has been quietly performing “clandestine horticulture” for 34 years, with no trouble.  He’s planted 40,000 flowers far and wide – at embassies and memorials, even in other countries, like Cambodia, Argentina.  He tells the Post, “I’m not denying that I’m a little nuts”.  I say, nuts in the best possible way.  He’s the son of a well-known District community activist, and I guess he sees beautification as a form of community activism, which I certainly think it is.

Until now he’s stayed under the radar, but since his citation has gone public with this website, which is bringing attention and support for his cause, as have other online campaigns to protest anti-gardening laws and regulations.  (Think HOAs and cities that require all-grass front yards.)  Doctor is respecting Metro’s order that he stop watering the plants (Metro cites safety concerns), but he’s worried.  He’s a gardener.  When there’s no rain, we fret.

Next, in “Horticulture Heist, the New York Times’ Ethicist was asked to weigh in on the ethics of taking cuttings from plants in a shopping center – which plants could not be found at any store, we’re told.  So, is this stealing?  The Ethicist’s considered opinion is that if he were to place unethical acts on an ascending continuum of 1 to 100, he’d give the cuttings-thieves “a 4.  Maybe a 3.”

One more thing.  This week’s New Yorker has a cool city garden on the cover, and click here to scroll through years of gardening-related covers.

Posted by

Susan Harris
on June 25, 2013 at 8:31 am, in the category Ministry of Controversy, What’s Happening.

3 Comments
    • admin
    • 21st June 2017

    Perhaps the government wants tiny security cameras there and devices collecting meta data?

    • admin
    • 24th July 2017

    As to the “Horticulture Heist,” that’s just plain wrong on so many levels. Not finding a desired plant at 2 nurseries is a typical Saturday for most gardeners. Surely it was available mail-order somewhere.

    • Laura Bell
    • 13th August 2017

    While I agree with your statement “If public landscapes let everyone take a little piece instead of sourcing their own, there wouldn’t be much of a public landscape left”, I cannot let it go without comment that the number of people who would know what to do with a cutting is a very small fraction of the populace. So many seem to think gardening is difficult, requiring advanced knowledge, if not actual magic potions. Growing from a cutting? Pure voodoo!

Leave a comment

Recent Posts

The Wrong Way to Teach Eco-Friendly Gardening

I recently attended a “Green Yards and Gardens” talk in my town. The intern giving the talk was more knowledgeable than I expected, but the topics covered were no surprise: natives, invasives, ...

Read More

Learning to say goodbye—with pleasure

These hydrangeas, lilies, phlox, and so on used to be raspberry bushes. Death is  part of life, but this  fact is accepted with difficulty and nowhere more so than among gardeners. Perennials ...

Read More