When gardens become reminders of war and tragedy

When gardens become reminders of war and tragedy

Spread the love

Photo courtesy Oehme van Sweden

I have two bones to pick about gardens being destroyed or co-opted to honor the dead.  Yes, I’m going there. First, a national war memorial threatens to destroy an important landscape and second, a garden is used to remind visitors of a local tragedy, a situation that could happen anywhere.

The important landscape is Pershing Park in Washington, D.C., about a block from the White House. It was designed by a rock star among landscape architects – M. Paul Friedberg – and updated by the famous local firm of Oehme van Sweden (featured recently on Gardenandthegoodlife). The sunny photos above show the park its its glory days, when the traffic-cancelling waterworks still worked, and the plants were alive and well.  I ate lunch there whenever I could.

Photo courtesy The Cultural Landscape Foundation

Above left, Pershing Park as it once was and right, as it is today. The Washington City Paper called it a “ghostly place.”  Today the fountain is broken, the delightful chairs and tables that once graced the park have been replaced by concrete benches, and the plantings and sunken water garden are long gone.

But instead of repairing and maintaining the park, Congress has decided it should be turned into yet another memorial to war – this time World War I.  This city already has two memorials to that war (including this one, recently renovated) but some see the need for another. Five designs have been chosen as finalists for a new WWI Memorial on the site, and they all call for demolition of the existing landscape.

Instead of, say, fixing the place, adding a new plaque about WWI, and saving money.

Thankfully there’s a national organization that cares about preserving significant landscapes like this one – The Cultural Landscape Foundation – and it’s hellbent on saving it. “Pershing Park is Threatened” tells the story, including how to help.

The Foundation’s director Charles Birnbaum explains the park’s situation today: “When you have a landscape that has a water feature, and you stop maintaining the water feature, then you stop maintaining the plantings at the same level. What we have here is bare-minimum maintenance. They empty the garbage.”

Issues here include the perennial problem of neglecting maintenance, the relative ease of raising funds for something shiny and new, and decision-makers who don’t value our “cultural landscapes.”

Another local garden I love is Brookside Gardens, Montgomery County, Maryland’s public garden, which includes this serene spot on its 25 acres. My beef is with what county leaders decided to place at the other end of this lake:

And below, an account of the months in 2002 when locals feared death by sniper shooting as they went about their daily lives.

And here are the names of the victims.

Of course I understand that the families of victims – of war, of random violence, of terrorism – might want a special place to remember their loved ones, and what prettier place to do that than in the nearest public garden?

But what about all the other garden visitors, who just want to spend time in a beautiful place and not have to “reflect on those lost to violence?”

Is the solution to create new places especially for remembrance? That would cost more, of course, and that’s probably the rub.

Posted by

Susan Harris
on October 23, 2015 at 9:51 am, in the category Public Gardens.

7 Comments
    • admin
    • 26th June 2017

    I can only wonder at why Pershing Park was so changed–money? Security? The earlier version looks lovely. And of course, since we’re all gardeners here, less cement and more plants will always be preferable!

    • Mary Gray
    • 23rd August 2017

    The memorial is not to the snipers but to the victims, just as the 9/11 memorials are. In my opinion the names on the rock are not blaring but rather understated. I recently visited Brookside and didn’t feel that this little spot troublesome at all. I found the message about peaceful coexistence to be very appropriate and calming.

    • admin
    • 9th September 2017

    Mary, I understand that the memorial is for the victims, not the snipers, my mistake. Maybe I should have said “sniper victims’ memorial” to describe it, instead?

    • Peter
    • 10th September 2017

    Interesting coincidence that you write about Pershing Park since I work across the street, we just had a fire drill and that is our rally point. 🙂 Perhaps it would be more appropriate to just restore it to its original glory and make it sort of an “adjunct World War I Memorial;” I mean that is what Pershing is most associated with anyways….

    • Sandra Knauf
    • 11th September 2017

    I think we should put HUGE memorials in parks in all the cities that have had these senseless shootings–maybe when they’re in every city, in everyone’s face, all the time, we’ll do something about it.

    • Charlotte
    • 11th September 2017

    Appreciated your post! I thought I was the only one who felt this way, I agree with you. I’m not sure why there seems in our current day that there must be a memorial to all horrible events. Things like this have been going on since the world began and will continue. I appreciated that they are people who want their loved ones remember but I for one don’t wish to ponder and dwell on death and hatred when I’m surrounded by beautiful gardens and landscape. I go to parks to forget my troubles and my griefs and to admired the beautiful things in the world. We needs place where we can go and destress our lives. I’m all for maintaining our current gardens and I believe that people who do not garden do not understand how much work and time it takes to make and grow one. I’m not against memorials, they have there place but should not be at the expense of destroying a beautiful park. In our city they destroyed about 2 dozen trees that were over 100 years old, other shrubs and flowers and replaced it with a concrete memorial with concrete walk ways and benches, there is nothing of beauty just a cold dead memorial.
    Thank you for willingness to address this sentive issue.

    • Susan
    • 11th September 2017

    I generally agree with you, Susan. And it seems to me that memorials are now just being shoehorned into places at random. We need a memorial for something? Oh, look – here’s some empty space. We’ll put it here! It’s destroying the aesthetics of beautiful places where we go in search of peace and serenity. I don’t understand it.

Leave a comment

Recent Posts

The Wrong Way to Teach Eco-Friendly Gardening

I recently attended a “Green Yards and Gardens” talk in my town. The intern giving the talk was more knowledgeable than I expected, but the topics covered were no surprise: natives, invasives, ...

Read More

Learning to say goodbye—with pleasure

These hydrangeas, lilies, phlox, and so on used to be raspberry bushes. Death is  part of life, but this  fact is accepted with difficulty and nowhere more so than among gardeners. Perennials ...

Read More